Controversial Batangas Representative Leandro Leviste has admitted that he remains the owner of a solar power firm linked to major government contracts, but firmly insisted that his business interests do not violate constitutional restrictions imposed on public officials.
Leviste confirmed that he still owns Solar Philippines Power Holdings Inc. (SPPHI), a company that holds shares in SP New Energy Corp. (SPNEC), on the same day he filed a civil libel complaint against Palace press officer Claire Castro over statements about his solar energy business. The lawmaker maintained that his continued ownership is lawful and consistent with the 1987 Constitution.
Citing Article VI, Section 14 of the Constitution, Leviste acknowledged the provision that bars members of Congress from having direct or indirect financial interests in government contracts, franchises, or special privileges during their term. However, he said he was advised by legal counsel that mere ownership of shares does not automatically constitute a violation, particularly when safeguards are in place.
According to Leviste, all his shareholdings are fully disclosed in his Statement of Assets, Liabilities, and Net Worth (SALN). He also emphasized that he does not participate in discussions, policymaking, or legislation related to the energy sector and has deliberately avoided involvement in the House committee on energy to prevent any potential conflict of interest.
“I am very obviously well-advised and well-informed by my lawyers,” Leviste said, warning that a broad interpretation of the constitutional ban could unfairly implicate many lawmakers with private business interests. He called for a comprehensive review of possible conflicts of interest among all 318 members of Congress, suggesting a public discussion on disclosures and corporate ties scheduled for January 26.
SPPHI recently drew public attention after the Department of Energy imposed a P24-billion penalty over allegations that it failed to deliver power output under more than 30 government service contracts. Leviste strongly disputed the accusation, arguing that the projects in question were never granted the necessary permits to proceed, making delivery impossible.
He also clarified that the hefty fine appeared to apply specifically to SP New Energy Corp., not SPPHI. Leviste stressed that he has no management role or operational involvement in SPNEC, distancing himself from its day-to-day decisions.
“I’ve always been transparent about my ownership interests,” Leviste said, reiterating that he has taken great care to avoid discussions or actions involving companies in which he has a stake.
Despite mounting scrutiny, Leviste maintained that transparency, disclosure, and non-participation in related legislative matters are sufficient to uphold both the letter and spirit of the Constitution.