A Muntinlupa Regional Trial Court (RTC) has issued a writ of habeas data against director Darryl Yap, mandating the removal of promotional materials for his upcoming film, “The Rapists of Pepsi Paloma.” The court’s decision came in response to a petition filed by actor and host Vic Sotto, who is mentioned and accused of rape in the film’s teaser.
The RTC Branch 205’s order prohibits Yap from further distributing any promotional content related to the film. It specifically instructs the director to take down all materials already posted on social media and forbids the sharing of these posts.
Sotto’s legal counsel, Atty. Enrique Dela Cruz emphasized that the court’s issuance of the writ of habeas data is a protective measure for his client’s rights. He stated, “The court has issued a writ of habeas data as his right was violated so he was temporarily granted habeas data.” Dela Cruz further urged all parties to cease posting or sharing related content until the matter is resolved.
“The Rapists of Pepsi Paloma” is a biographical crime drama directed by Darryl Yap, focusing on the life of Pepsi Paloma, a Filipino-American actress and dancer who gained fame in the 1980s. The film has sparked controversy due to its sensitive subject matter, particularly the depiction of a 1982 scandal involving Paloma and several entertainment personalities, including Vic Sotto.
Pepsi Paloma, born Delia Dueñas Smith, was a prominent figure in the Philippine entertainment industry during the early 1980s. She was part of a group known as the “soft drink” beauties, alongside Sarsi Emmanuelle and Coca Nicolas. Paloma’s career was marked by both popularity and controversy, notably the 1982 incident where she accused comedians Vic Sotto, Joey de Leon, and Richie D’Horsie of rape. The case was highly publicized, and the accused reportedly issued a public apology. Tragically, Paloma died by suicide in 1985.
Director Darryl Yap announced the film in late 2024, aiming to shed light on Paloma’s life and the controversies she faced. The teaser, released on January 1, 2025, quickly went viral, eliciting mixed reactions from the public. Some praised Yap’s bold storytelling, while others criticized the film’s potential impact on the individuals involved and their families. Yap defended his work, stating that the film focuses on Paloma’s story and is not intended to malign any particular individual.
The court’s recent order adds a legal dimension to the ongoing debate surrounding the film. As the situation develops, it underscores the complex interplay between artistic expression, historical events, and the rights of individuals portrayed in media.
As of now, there has been no public response from Darryl Yap or his representatives regarding the court’s directive. The film’s future, including its scheduled release, remains uncertain pending compliance with the court’s order and further legal proceedings.