Alfred Vargas received complaints from his constituents for a failed low-cost housing project.
Actor turned politician Alfred Vargas received complaints from his constituents because of a failed housing project.
He is currently under fire for a situation that went beyond his control as the Congressman of the 5th District of Quezon City.
Based on the article published in Abante, Alfred’s constituents demanded him for a refund for the money they paid for housing project.
Under the office of the Congressman, people paid a certain a moment of money to avail the low-cost housing project.
On the other hand, the person that Alfred trusted to handle the said project did not do his job.
Because of that, the lawmaker is now the one who is trapped in the controversy.
According to the complainants, they had been waiting for too long for the refund of their money which they paid for the low-cost housing project.
A heated argument occurred between the two camps but Alfred Vargas never denied the accusation.
It was also said that he has no plan of ignoring the complainants.
The Congressman knows that the controversy involved a huge sum of money. He pointed out that in order to address the issue, a systematic approach should be done.
https://www.instagram.com/p/BiyvgtXlqAw/?taken-by=alfredvargasofficial
This step can be useful to avoid further confusion.
The Kapuso actor also said that he is willing to work double time in doing his engagements in show business just to earn the needed amount to pay the complainants.
With this, Alfred also asked the help of his constituents in order to make the culprit pay for what he did.
This was the complete statement of the actor-politician:
“Napakalaking halaga po ang pinag-uusapan natin dito. Kailangan pong meron tayong mas maayos na sistemang gawin para sa refund to avoid further confusion. Kung kinakailangang magkayod kalabaw ako sa mga taping at shooting ay gagawin ko para lang mabuo ang pera, pero sana po ay matulungan din ninyo ako na habulin ang tunay na nasa likod ng scam na ito.”
Based on the article, there were ‘professional claimants’ who are claiming for a refund even though they are not victims.